<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: George on George</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archives.republicoft.com/index.php/archives/2004/05/04/george-on-george/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archives.republicoft.com/index.php/archives/2004/05/04/george-on-george/</link>
	<description>Black. Gay. Father. Vegetarian. Buddhist. Liberal.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 22:26:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wulf</title>
		<link>http://archives.republicoft.com/index.php/archives/2004/05/04/george-on-george/#comment-31238</link>
		<dc:creator>Wulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2005 20:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/index.php/archives/2004/05/04/george-on-george/#comment-31238</guid>
		<description>Yeah.  Bush has no idea that India is a democracy.  He clearly thinks India is the 15th planet.  And he obviously thinks that all Americans are white and Christian.

Come on.  Bush has made mistakes, and he has pursued bad policies, but *this* is a non issue, and it is stupid and unconstructive to pretend that it somehow shows that he is a dimwitted bigot.  Target *real* issues.

&quot;There’s a lot of people in the world who don’t believe that people whose skin color may not be the same as ours can be free and self-govern.&quot;
That&#039;s a true statement, the only issue with it is why he said &quot;ours&quot;.  Considering that Bush was talking in the context of the US-Canadian relations wrt Iraq, and considering that the US is 70% non-Hispanic white, and Canada even more white, I think he was probably (foolishly but correctly) saying &quot;our&quot; skin is mostly white and very little Arab, which is the group racists keep saying cannot self-govern.
(He might even have meant &quot;ours&quot; as in &quot;mine and yours&quot;, since he was talking to a white reporter.)

But is this really the most important part of the comment?  The fact is that lot of people in the world do believe that skin color affects the ability of a people to be free and self-govern.  And Bush&#039;s response is unequivocal: &quot;I reject that. I reject that strongly. I believe that people who practice the Muslim faith can self-govern. I believe that people whose skins aren’t necessarily — are a different color than white can self-govern.”  For all his faults, this is a good notion.

Remember, this has been questioned on the left and the right, and Bush&#039;s lack of inclusive language is not as important as the fact that there is nothing inherent in being a Muslim or an Arab that precludes self determination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah.  Bush has no idea that India is a democracy.  He clearly thinks India is the 15th planet.  And he obviously thinks that all Americans are white and Christian.</p>
<p>Come on.  Bush has made mistakes, and he has pursued bad policies, but *this* is a non issue, and it is stupid and unconstructive to pretend that it somehow shows that he is a dimwitted bigot.  Target *real* issues.</p>
<p>&#8220;There’s a lot of people in the world who don’t believe that people whose skin color may not be the same as ours can be free and self-govern.&#8221;<br />
That&#8217;s a true statement, the only issue with it is why he said &#8220;ours&#8221;.  Considering that Bush was talking in the context of the US-Canadian relations wrt Iraq, and considering that the US is 70% non-Hispanic white, and Canada even more white, I think he was probably (foolishly but correctly) saying &#8220;our&#8221; skin is mostly white and very little Arab, which is the group racists keep saying cannot self-govern.<br />
(He might even have meant &#8220;ours&#8221; as in &#8220;mine and yours&#8221;, since he was talking to a white reporter.)</p>
<p>But is this really the most important part of the comment?  The fact is that lot of people in the world do believe that skin color affects the ability of a people to be free and self-govern.  And Bush&#8217;s response is unequivocal: &#8220;I reject that. I reject that strongly. I believe that people who practice the Muslim faith can self-govern. I believe that people whose skins aren’t necessarily — are a different color than white can self-govern.”  For all his faults, this is a good notion.</p>
<p>Remember, this has been questioned on the left and the right, and Bush&#8217;s lack of inclusive language is not as important as the fact that there is nothing inherent in being a Muslim or an Arab that precludes self determination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shannon</title>
		<link>http://archives.republicoft.com/index.php/archives/2004/05/04/george-on-george/#comment-887</link>
		<dc:creator>shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/index.php/archives/2004/05/04/george-on-george/#comment-887</guid>
		<description>And how about his conflation of Islam with nonwhite skin, too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And how about his conflation of Islam with nonwhite skin, too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janine</title>
		<link>http://archives.republicoft.com/index.php/archives/2004/05/04/george-on-george/#comment-888</link>
		<dc:creator>Janine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/index.php/archives/2004/05/04/george-on-george/#comment-888</guid>
		<description>As Shannon said -- it&#039;s so wrong on so many different fronts that the mind just *boggles*.  I sat here and reread that three times with my jaw agape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Shannon said &#8212; it&#8217;s so wrong on so many different fronts that the mind just *boggles*.  I sat here and reread that three times with my jaw agape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a reader</title>
		<link>http://archives.republicoft.com/index.php/archives/2004/05/04/george-on-george/#comment-889</link>
		<dc:creator>a reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/index.php/archives/2004/05/04/george-on-george/#comment-889</guid>
		<description>With his revealing remarks about &#039;brown-skinned&#039; people&#039;s possibly limited capacity for democratic self-government, Bush not only shows his contempt for vast numbers of American citizens, but also shows himself to be shockingly unaware of the fact that the world&#039;s largest democracy is India, with a population of over a billion (1,027,015,247 persons in 2001).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With his revealing remarks about &#8216;brown-skinned&#8217; people&#8217;s possibly limited capacity for democratic self-government, Bush not only shows his contempt for vast numbers of American citizens, but also shows himself to be shockingly unaware of the fact that the world&#8217;s largest democracy is India, with a population of over a billion (1,027,015,247 persons in 2001).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lean Left</title>
		<link>http://archives.republicoft.com/index.php/archives/2004/05/04/george-on-george/#comment-890</link>
		<dc:creator>Lean Left</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/index.php/archives/2004/05/04/george-on-george/#comment-890</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bush Gaffe&lt;/strong&gt;
Republic of T has an interesting perspective on the recent Bush gaffe concerning race and self governance. Quoth Bush:&quot;There&#039;s a...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bush Gaffe</strong><br />
Republic of T has an interesting perspective on the recent Bush gaffe concerning race and self governance. Quoth Bush:&#8221;There&#8217;s a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Republic of T.  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Bush On Blacks</title>
		<link>http://archives.republicoft.com/index.php/archives/2004/05/04/george-on-george/#comment-3009</link>
		<dc:creator>The Republic of T.  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Bush On Blacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/index.php/archives/2004/05/04/george-on-george/#comment-3009</guid>
		<description>[...] nyway, a co-worker forwarded Krugman&#8217;s column to me, and I was instantly reminded of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.republicoft.com/index.php/archives/2004/05/04/george-on-george/&quot;&gt;a post I wrote about while back&lt;/a&gt; about Bush opening his mouth to talk a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nyway, a co-worker forwarded Krugman&#8217;s column to me, and I was instantly reminded of <a href="http://www.republicoft.com/index.php/archives/2004/05/04/george-on-george/">a post I wrote about while back</a> about Bush opening his mouth to talk a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

