The first thing I thought when I heard the story of Lucan Dawson was “good for him. Dawson, an aspiring singer was gay-bashed by seven men, and in an attempt to defend himself during the seven-on-one struggle he ended up stabbing one of them.
Dawson, 21, of Upsal Street near Magnolia, managed to get to his feet, and he pulled out a small pocket knife. He waved it at the crowd a few times, David Dawson said, trying to push them back.
Then, he ran.
Gerald Knight, 17, allegedly followed and then reached out to grab Dawson, who still had the knife in his hand.
During the ensuing struggle, Dawson plunged the knife into Knight’s chest.
Knight, of Hortter Street near Chew Avenue, died at Einstein Medical Center less than an hour later, police said.
There was a time when I might have been somewhat conflicted by this story, back when I considered myself a near total pacifist. While I still consider myself a non-violent person, I’ve found that there are times when I will resort to violence if necessary, like a threat to my son’s life or my husbands; or my own, because I’ll be damned if I’m simply going to lose one minute of the lifetime I plan to spend with my husband, watching our kids grow up.
So, I don’t blame Dawson for his actions, but I was a little stunned to hear that he’d been charged with manslaughter after turning himself in.
Dawson is currently in jail charged with voluntary manslaughter. His family could not raise the money to meet his $30,000 bail. Even if he is acquitted of the charges, his family remains worried for his safety. They said the three remaining teens threatened to shoot Dawson.
Stunned, I filed the item away, mentally composing a rant to post later during the day. Fortunately I don’t have to, because a judge saw reason and thrown out the manslaughter charge.
Municipal Judge Gerard Kosinski also ordered 21-year-old Lucas Dawson, an aspiring singer, released from jail.
…”He did the only thing he could do, the only thing in his power to stop the attack,” defense attorney Kevin T. Birley said.
I can’t put it any better than KipEsquire put it:
Still, one wonders how long it will be before some hateful commentator throws down the “special rights for gays” gauntlet, insists that gays are instinctively violent and even homicidal, and of course accuses the judge who threw out the charge of being “activist.”
Meanwhile, it really is important to remember that it’s not just about marriage and that there really are people who want to see all gays dead.
It was on the tip of my tongue to say that surely no one on the right would be outrageous enough to bring the “special rights” argument to bear in this case. But then I remember the times we’re living in, and I can almost hear the talking points about how this “radical homosexual” violated the free speech rights of these young men who were simply expressing their disapproval of his “lifestyle,” and that this ruling is “open season on heterosexuals, etc.” Maybe we won’t hear any of this, but it won’t surprise me if we do.
If you ask me, it was a simple case of his attackers being in the wrong place, at the wrong time, bashing the wrong queer; one who fought back. It’s kind of surprising that after all these decades of surviving McCarthyism, throwing a pick in the face of Anita Bryant, staring down the AIDS epidemic, and persisting despite everything the haters try to do to us, they still don’t expect us to fight back.
They don’t expect us to fight for our lives, because they don’t believe our lives are worth anything and they don’t expect us to believe it either. Believing our lives are worth fighting for is our best defense.
Technorati Tags: current events, gay rights
Go for the eyes and the crotch, I say. Good for him, I hope the "scales of justice" come down in his favor.
Pingback: A Stitch in Haste
" … and persisting despite everything the haters try to do to us, they still don’t expect us to fight back."
At this point, you should know, Terrance. You’re one of the haters, now. You’ve internalized the worldview of Joe McCarthy — though you think it is all the difference in the world that your set of enemies is the flip side of his set of enemies.
How good it must feel to give in to the waves of self-righteousness, feelings of paranoia, and snuggle in the warmth of the commeraderie of your team, The Eternal Victims.
There will be no end to fodder for your blog! The complaints will never end! You can have "I am abused!!" tattooed to your chest! "I grieve!" you can scream, tearfully, laughingly.
You can wake up every morning thinking "I have been wronged!," and within a few hours you can manufacture a justification for that sentiment.
Some people think it is a good thing for a man to finally figure out his life’s work.
Part of me secretly cheered when I heard this story. My first thought was, "Maybe this will make those horrible brutes think twice before attacking someone. Too bad he only got one."
I used to think of myself as a pacifist, before I became a parent. Being responsible for someone else changes everything. I think I could kill someone with my bare hands if that was the way to protect my child.
I just hope the young man in the story doesn’t let this one incident make him bitter or control his life. And I hope everyone continues to fight back.
I think there’s something Kip said that bears repeating here.
Like I’ve said before of the religious right, there vision of America — and, indeed, the world — is one in which we don’t exist.
Terrance,
Why stop at "want to see all gays dead"? Surely, you want to be a leader at your craft of hate and victimization. Why not "Most Americans want to see all gays eviserated"?
I see that "Tom" doesn’t get it. No big whoop. Speaking of self-defense though, I think San Franciscans did gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered persons a GREAT disservice by voting to ban handguns within SF county limits. Nothing is going to be a better defense against gay bashers with baseball bats than a loaded handgun, in my opinion. Time will tell if the ban wil hold.